LEAC · Board sub-committee
WORK IN PROGRESS — DRAFT
LEAC · cultural architecture

Co-design process tracker

Phase-1 co-design tracker — process status only. No cultural content is authored here.

Sessions logged
Total process records
Held
Status: held
Outputs landed
Status: outputs landed
Pending / scheduled
Pending cultural review or scheduled
Pending cultural review

This page tracks the process — not the model.

The LEAC's First Nations cultural architecture — the caucus, the co-chair arrangement, the Elder / cultural-authority roles and the cultural-safety protocols — is co-designed on Country, by community. It is not authored in this portal, and nothing on this page prescribes it.

What this surface records: that co-design sessions are happening, which candidate partner organisation is being approached (a process fact — partners are confirmed by community, not by DAS, and listing one here is not an endorsement), and where each session sits (pending cultural review → scheduled → held → outputs landed). When outputs land, they are confirmed by community and brought in through that process — never typed in here.

TOR §3 — First Nations cultural architecture elements co-design in progress

The four elements below are determined through Phase-1 co-design on Country. This surface shows process status only — the model for each element is held by community, not pre-configured here.

Caucus model
Pending cultural review

The structure, membership and protocols of any caucus are determined by co-design. No model is authored or pre-set here.

Co-chair arrangement
Pending cultural review

Whether and how a co-chair role operates is determined by co-design. No arrangement is pre-set here.

Elder / cultural-authority roles
Pending cultural review

The form and scope of any Elder or cultural-authority role is determined by co-design. No role is pre-defined here.

Cultural-safety protocols
Pending cultural review

Cultural-safety protocols are determined by co-design on Country. No protocol is authored here.

Candidate partner organisations being approached process fact — confirm with community, not an endorsement

The organisations below are candidate partners named in the Phase-1 co-design plan as organisations that may be approached. Their presence here records that an approach is being made or considered — it is a process fact, not an endorsement or a statement of their agreement. Partner organisations are confirmed by community, not by DAS.

Organisation Sessions referencing this org Latest status Process note
Loading…

Data is derived from co-design session records. Log a session with a partner name to update this table. All entries carry confirm with community status until co-design formally advances.

Co-design sessions
Session Date Partner approached Status Process notes
Loading…
+ Log a co-design session (process only)

Process notes are for logistics (who attended, when, the next step) — never the caucus / co-chair / cultural-authority model. That is co-designed on Country and held by community.